Review: I, Vampire #2

I, Vampire #2, cover by Jenny Frison

Sometimes, love sucks.  A lot.  Though a culture of romantic comedies and pop music have conditioned us to believe that all you really need is love, we all eventually find out that that’s not really true.  You need a lot of things.  You need food.  You need shelter.  You need, above all I sometimes think, a purpose.  When I left for grad school, I had to break my own heart – and someone else’s – because we both already knew what we wanted in life… and we knew that what we wanted took us down vastly different paths in life.  Having a purpose can hurt, but it’s a big part of the drive that keeps us going every day.

Mary, Queen of Blood, has a purpose.  She wants freedom for her people, even though freedom for vampires means freedom to feed on humans.  And she’s willing to do what she needs to to get it.  She’s willing to die. She’s willing to kill hundreds. And she’s willing to betray her lover, leaving him to death and disgrace.

Comic book villains don’t exactly have a great track record when it comes to depth, but Fialkov does fantastic work of getting us into Mary’s head quickly.  What she’s doing is wrong, yes, and Mary is certainly not a very good person, but she quickly becomes a sympathetic one.  Cocky, powerful, and at least still a little in love with our hero, she was raised in servitude and with all her power, she’s sick of living in it once more.  Focusing on Mary this issue was a smart move: knowing that she feels the same way Andrew does makes his quest (and their inevitable confrontations) all the more tragic, whereas any uncertainty on out part could have derailed the entire concept.

Last week, detractors complained about the art of Andrea Sorrentino and colorist Marcelo Maiolo, claiming that it was muddy and grim, making it difficult to tell what was happening.  I disagreed.  I think this issue will probably see similar complaints, but the understated grace of Mary and Andrew’s fight scene would have been hurt from the crisper art that dominates superhero comics (and makes many fight scenes bland and borderline senseless, like this week’s in Aquaman) – as is, it has a rhythm, a flow, a sense of pacing lost from most battles you read in comics.  Sorrentino and Maiolo have a fantastic chemistry, and their work suits Fialkov’s scripts flawlessly.

For my money I, Vampire #1 was one of the best new books to come out of the New 52 (and to come out of mainstream comics in quite some time).  Inventive, clever and engaging, it was little more than a long conversation, but it managed to set up the world, the characters and the plot while establishing exactly what kind of story we’d be reading.  I, Vampire #2 is one of the few issues of the New 52 to surpass its opener.   Lovely, memorable art combines with Fialkov’s fantastic character work to create a must-read monthly comic.

- Cal C.

read/RANT

About these ads

3 Responses to Review: I, Vampire #2

  1. xxadverbxx says:

    Its good, and as it focused only on Mary’s thoughts it was easier to follow. My big complaint on the art was it took a moment for me to see the difference between the past and present scenes and until then it was a bit confusing. More so, their dialogue and inner monologues were so closely colored I got lost often in who was talking/thinking when.

    Story wise, I am enjoying it but still wonder how well this will continue to last while taking place with the rest of the DC Universe. They gave a body count of 300, plus all the vampires that Andrew ripped to shreds. That body count is like the giant explosions of Legion Lost though, something to a big enough extent I find it hard at least some superhero won’t take notice and try to jump in. And when that happens I wonder how that would play out. If it doesn’t happen I’ll just be lost to how this body count is going on without catching their notice.

    Basically if this story was taking place not in the DC Universe I could really enjoy it.

    • ikeebear says:

      I’m with you about the art. I really like it, but wish it was a little clearer who is who.

      Time periods could be clarified with a simple text box … DC seem to be doing a really bad job of flashbacks in the New 52 (where a scene is set in the past with no indication of that fact before switching to something in the present, which is labelled … and you think “so that other stuff WASN’T the present?!?!”).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,965 other followers

%d bloggers like this: