Review: Batman and Robin #5


Morrison has generally been quite clear, over the years, about his opinion on the grim ‘n gritty anti-hero that has so pervaded comics in recent years.  It isn’t a trend towards which he’s shown very much respect, largely because, ultimately, there’s no way to maintain it.  Escalation leads to escalation, but in a medium that cannot abide true and lasting change, the escalation rings hollow – supporting characters are created solely to die, but we all know the A/B-listers are safe and always will be.  “Revenge of the Red Hood” displays this premise in short order as, only a single issue after Red Hood burst onto Gotham’s crimefighting scene with catchy ‘cool’ slogans and a sidekick with a tragic past, the escalation begins to go past what even Gotham is comfortable with.

Tan remains a surprisingly good fit for the book.  While his design leaves something to be desired after seeing some of Quitely’s more inspired work in the first three issues, the grim, oppressive atmosphere so natural to Tan’s art fits Morrison’s story perfectly.  There are a few points during which I felt Tan failed, most notably with the (SPOILER) reveal that Red Hood was Jason Todd, since he looked about 10-20 years older than Jason Todd, and with all of Jason Blood’s features (END).  Despite the occasional slip-up, however, Tan’s clear, dark art makes for an excellent contrast from the circus of villains the first arc provided.

Batman and Robin remains a remarkably strong title.  This issue sees Morrison keep his promise to use the title to create a new host of chilling Bat-villains and reinvigorate one of comics most well-known (and increasingly overused) rogues’ galleries with the late-game introduction of Eduardo Flamingo, the King of Killers.  Morrison largely eschews the slow-boil continuity-rich mystery that so pervaded his Batman run in favor of a wonderfully straightforward, undeniably clever action comic.

Grade: A-

– Cal Cleary


Batman and Robin #4

Batman and Robin #3

5 thoughts on “Review: Batman and Robin #5

  1. Hi, I’m here to disagree.

    Tan’s work is mediocre at best. I’d even go so far as to say he’s a step down from Tony Daniel. Tan’s art isn’t “clear, dark” (Can any art be those two things at once?) it’s just dark.

    His poses are awkward. His characters are indistinguishable, and if it weren’t for Sinclair’s return, you probably couldn’t see much at all. Though Morrison’s words made me fear Flamingo, Tan’s image had little impact.

    And I too am puzzled at Morrison’s ultra-violence. Is my frustration with Tan blinding me from recognizing a deeper subtext? What happened to the Morrison who used most of his X-Men run to illustrate the consequences of violence?

  2. Tan’s image of Flamingo was my other big problem with the issue – after seeing Quitely introduce a host of crazy, scary, amazing new villains last arc, Tan’s design was uninspired and muddled. I don’t mention that part in my review specifically, but since I complain about Tan’s design, I figured I could leave it at that.

    And Morrison’s policy is in full-effect – only a single issue after Red Hood shows up, someone comes to Gotham, hired to kill him, who ‘eats faces’. As Scarlet says, “What happens when WE start making enemies?”

  3. Pingback: Review: Batman and Robin #6 « read/RANT!

  4. Pingback: Review: Batman and Robin #7 « read/RANT!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s