Review: Action Comics #3

Action Comics #3, cover by Morales & Anderson

Superman is an old character, and one that some people have often had trouble relating to.  Seen as the ultimate boy scout, as a man in a stable marriage who works a 9-to-5 job, teens in particular often reject him.  And while other writers have played up Superman’s genuine outsider status (most brilliantly in recent years, Kurt Busiek in the fantastic and melancholy Superman: Secret Identity), few have aligned it so thoroughly with the spirit of teenage rebellion than Grant Morrison is doing in Action Comics right now.  I don’t know if the audience will bite, but Morrison has envisioned a thoroughly youthful Superman, a self-righteous warrior for truth with a black-and-white view of right and wrong and the power to try and enforce change.   But like we all discover eventually, change is really, really, really, really hard – even for Superman – and pushing against the status quo is a great way to make enemies.

The issue opens on Krypton.  More specifically, the issue opens on a full-on invasion of Krypton by a mysterious alien creature – a monstrosity we saw last issue communicating with Lex Luthor.  After introducing us to the villain of his opening arc, Morrison brings the action back to Earth, picking up shortly after last issue left off.  Clark, exhausted from his torture at the hands of the U.S. Government, is passed out in his room when the police raid his apartment, looking for evidence that he’s working with Superman.  They don’t find any, thanks to some quick thinking from his landlady, but it sets the tone for an issue in which nothing can go right for our hero.  From Mr. Glenmorgan turning the story of his arrest into an effective anti-alien media campaign to an invasion of alien tech happening at just the wrong moment, the “World Against Superman” is packed with incident, none of it good for our hero.

This is the first issue that fails to top what came before.  Morrison rarely used the decompressed, trade-baiting narrative structure that has overtaken most comics these days, instead opting to hyper-compress certain iconic elements to a single moment (think of All-Star Superman, which deals with the hero’s origin in a single, four-panel page: “Doomed planet. Desperate scientists. Last hope. Kindly couple.”), but here, that tendency backfires.  The ‘hated and feared outsider’ trope is as old as storytelling, and beaten into the ground by lazy writers (especially when Spider-Man or the X-Men get involved), so I can see why Morrison would want to compress that story into a few short pages, but it does throw the pacing of the book off.  When Morrison’s hyper-compression works, you can feel like you read an entire story in just a couple words and pictures; when it doesn’t, as here, it can often feel like there were panels or even whole pages missing.

Combine that with the inconsistent art this issue – Gene Ha helps series regular Rags Morales out this issue, and their styles don’t blend as well as Morales’ did with last week’s fill-in, Brent Anderson – and you have the first issue that isn’t an unqualified success.  Though Morrison’s plotting remains top-notch and he has a lot of fun with his supporting cast, whether it’s Jor-El in tricked out in sci-fi action hero gear or the way Clark Kent and the hyper-competitive Lois Lane keep stepping on each other’s toes for leads, this is the first issue to suffer from too many ideas.

Still, Action Comics #3, “World Against Superman,” is bursting with energy.  It is an endlessly readable, thrill-a-minute ode to the world’s foremost superhero, and I’m willing to forgive a surplus of ideas and the occasional pacing issue when a book’s as fun as this one is.  With tighter editing, Morrison’s inventive take could easily become a classic, but it’s still an engaging read that traffics in big ideas and big action.

- Cal C.

read/RANT

Action Comics #2 (and lebeau’s review)

Action Comics #1

About these ads

10 Responses to Review: Action Comics #3

  1. While this issue was better than #1 or #2 I still don’t like the direction DC has taken with Superman. Stand alone the story is good… but it is not “Superman.”

    • Cal Cleary says:

      Why not? They’ve made it clear that this is a younger, more reckless Superman – a throwback to his first 10-20 years of stories, but one who grows over the course of 5 years into the more mature, quietly confident version we’re familiar with (which is on display in the Superman title). What about if aren’t you liking?

    • Scud says:

      Read some Golden Age Superman and then try saying this isn’t Superman.

      • lebeau says:

        No, this is definitely Superman. Just not the Superman most readers are going to recognize. But he’ll get there when he’s more mature.

  2. lebeau says:

    I agree that some of the transitions were a bit jarring. But I still enjoyed the heck out of this issue. The great bits outnumbered the few missteps.

    • Cal Cleary says:

      Oh, definitely. But for me, it’s the first one where the missteps were large enough to be really clearly noticeable, which is why I focused a little more on them.

      • lebeau says:

        Agreed. The first two issues were great or at least very good. This issue was good to very good. Hopefully, we can get back to greatness.

  3. xxadverbxx says:

    I was rather confused with the start and that alien group we saw. Invasion of Krypton and taking over the data? I just kept thinking Braniac yet never saw mention of Braniac. Or did I just miss it for at the time I was bouncing between reading the comic and something else?

    I did love the police scene, despite the lack of warrant to search his place. I just wonder, did his land lady know, or did she just suspect up until that point? I really wish we got to see a bit less of Clark though and a bit more of Superman being hated by the public for once. Instead, we got two pages of him in gear and one of those panels of him being attacked by a mob. What??

    As far as Superman goes, I don’t know. I understand the reasoning of Morrison playing this younger Superman a little more brash and everything. But so far I don’t think Superman in Superman has really come off feeling like the old Superman has. Not to me at least. I’ve felt really no heart from the “current” Superman or even much caring for the people he protects or even a hint of that former boy scout that people around the world knew and loved. Hell, you see more of that in Morrison’s Superman with him looking out for the poor and common man.

  4. I really enjoyed this issue. I love seeing a Superman where he makes mistakes and isn’t sure what he is doing or what his place in the world is. It makes him easier to relate to.

  5. ikeebear says:

    As per my one sentence review, I didn’t enjoy this issue as much. I realise that, generally speaking, other people on read/RANT enjoy Morrison’s work more than I do, but I just didn’t like the jarring narrative and kooky elements for which he’s well-known (and well-liked). The one panel with Clark sitting on a bench and a seemingly homeless person saying something about a ghost dog just makes me go “WTF”. I’m finding Morales’ art to be frustratingly inconsistent too, with Superman sometimes looking like a boy (which is cool in the context of the story and timing) and sometimes like the more mature version of the character, and Clark looking decidely scrawny … and not just because of the baggy clothes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,867 other followers

%d bloggers like this: